Has anybody got any definitive diagrams or proven theories when it comes to vanes in roaster drums? 50-60rpm 9 inch diameter solid. Stuff like: Vane height as a ratio to the diameter of the drum. Number of vanes. Shape of vanes eg tapering from one end to the other. Angle of vanes to promote forward movement up a 10* slope. If the the angle is too severe with the beans be forced out the open front end of the drum? Apologies if that is a ludicrous outcome : ) Any and all information garnered through past experiences, or industry standards, much appreciated. Stephen Frame |
After trying an arrangement of two and four vanes running straight
across, I then moved to a two vane configuration where one vane was
angled to shift beans to the right and the other to shift beans to
the left. each vane covered about 1/4 of the diameter of the drum
and about 2/3's of the length of the drum with the open end at the
destination side. Each vane was one inch tall in a six inch diameter
drum. The result was an agitation that not only rotated the beans
toward and away from the drum surface but also moved the beans back
and forth across the length of the drum. I was quite happy with the
results.
Jim Gundlach
On Jan 4, 2006, at 9:33 AM, shark boy wrote:
<Snip> |
I have a 9" drum and use 1 1/4" high stirring vanes. They work just fine. ********************* Ed Needham "to absurdity and beyond!" ed at homeroaster dot com (include [FRIEND] somewhere in the subject line of any email correspondence) ********************* |
The vanes are there for agitation, to loft the bean through the air. I would guess, from personal experience making a drum roaster from scratch, that 6 vanes at least 1" tall will work fine for loads up to one pound. Above a pound add more height to the vanes, say to 1.5" <Snip> |
My drum has six 1/2" vanes (made with SS "L" bracket). Primary purpose is to keep the bean mass from sliding across the drum. The beans closest to the vane are pulled toward the top, then fall down, thus initiating a tumble. The roasts are very even with this arrangement. I haven't noticed any problem with beans not roasting evenly, but the angled vane idea makes sense to my pea-brain... Possible mod? Naw, too much work...... Brett On 1/4/06, Dan Bollinger wrote: <Snip> ould <Snip> 6 vanes <Snip> add <Snip> s to <Snip> ngle is <Snip> ttings <Snip> ribes) go tohttp://sweetmarias.com/maillistinfo.html#personalsettings<Snip> -- Regards, Brett Mason HomeRoast __]_ _(( )_ Please don't spill the coffee! |
Four vanes works just fine. I've built all shapes and sizes. Four works. ********************* Ed Needham "to absurdity and beyond!" ed at homeroaster dot com (include [FRIEND] somewhere in the subject line of any email correspondence) ********************* |